|
Tournoi du 03-10-18
BC Wavrien 03/10/2018
1 60,88 4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard
2 59,03 5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
3 55,79 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine
4 50,69 6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel
~ 50,69 8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean
6 50,00 9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane
7 48,15 7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy
8 39,35 1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel
9 35,42 3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,26 15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe
2 58,10 11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond
3 53,24 17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane
4 51,39 14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 51,16 10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique
6 49,77 16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc
7 46,06 13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian
8 40,74 12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre
9 40,28 18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane
PAIRE Nr : 1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 % 4 NS 2C E-1 100 4 25.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 % 7 NS 2S N = 120 2 12.50
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 2CcW+1 -870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %10 NS 3T W+1 -130 16 100.00
11 NS 2T E-1 50 13 81.25
12 NS 4C E-4 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 50.00
15 NS 2KcN-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %16 NS 3P E-1 100 6 37.50
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 12.50
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 37.50
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 18.75
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %22 NS 1S S = 90 15 93.75
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %25 NS 4C N = 420 1 6.25
26 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
27 NS 3P N = 140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 170,0 / 432 = 39,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 16 100.00
3 NS 3C W+2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 % 7 NS 4T N = 130 4 25.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 3P N+1 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %10 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 1S E-1 50 13 81.25
12 NS 3T W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
15 NS 2C E-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %16 NS 3P E-1 100 6 37.50
17 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %19 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 18.75
21 NS 2K N-3 -300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %22 NS 3C S-3 -150 1 6.25
23 NS 2K W = -90 12 75.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 4P E-2 200 16 100.00
27 NS 1S W = -90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 241,0 / 432 = 55,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 5P E+1 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 3C W+2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 4 25.00
5 NS 3C N = 140 2 12.50
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 4P N-3 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50
12 NS 3T W-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 25.00
15 NS 2C W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 10 62.50
17 NS 4P S+1 450 16 100.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %19 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
20 NS 2C N+1 140 15 93.75
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %22 NS 2T S-3 -150 1 6.25
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
24 NS 4CcN-1 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 NS 1S E = -90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 153,0 / 432 = 35,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 5P W+1 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 % 4 NS 3S W-3 300 16 100.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 % 7 NS 2S S+1 150 8 50.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75
9 NS 2P N = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %10 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 2CcS-1 -100 5 31.25
12 NS 2C E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 87.50
14 NS 6C E-2 100 16 100.00
15 NS 2C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 6 37.50
17 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 16 100.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 18.75
21 NS 3T W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %22 NS 2T S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 NS 4C E-2 200 16 100.00
24 NS 4CcS-1 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 12 75.00
27 NS 2T W = -90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 263,0 / 432 = 60,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 3T N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 14 87.50
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %10 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 1ScS-1 -100 5 31.25
12 NS 4C E-3 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 87.50
14 NS 6C E-1 50 13 81.25
15 NS 2C E-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %16 NS 4TcS = 510 16 100.00
17 NS 2P S+2 170 6 37.50
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %19 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 18.75
20 NS 2C N = 110 10 62.50
21 NS 2P W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %22 NS 3C S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 4T N-2 -200 2 12.50
27 NS 2TcW-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 255,0 / 432 = 59,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 4 25.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12 75.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %10 NS 4T W+1 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 1S E-1 50 13 81.25
12 NS 3T W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 5C E = -450 8 50.00
15 NS 2C W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %16 NS 4T N-2 -100 2 12.50
17 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %19 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
20 NS 2C N+1 140 15 93.75
21 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 75.00
23 NS 3T E-1 100 14 87.50
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 NS 2C N+1 140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 2C W+3 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 % 4 NS 3S W-2 200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 4C S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50
8 NS 4P N = 420 0 0.00
9 NS 2P N = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %10 NS 3T W+2 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 3K E-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 6C E-1 50 13 81.25
15 NS 2C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %16 NS 4PcE-2 500 14 87.50
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 12.50
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %19 NS 5C N-2 -100 3 18.75
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 18.75
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 %22 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %25 NS 4C N = 420 1 6.25
26 NS 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 NS 1S S+1 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 208,0 / 432 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 % 4 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 3C N+1 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 % 7 NS 4KcW-4 1100 16 100.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75
9 NS 2P N = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %10 NS 3T W+2 -150 9 56.25
11 NS 3S E-1 50 13 81.25
12 NS 3T W = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 31.25
14 NS 5C W = -450 8 50.00
15 NS 2C W = -110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %16 NS 4TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
17 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
18 NS 2P E+3 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %19 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
20 NS 2C N = 110 10 62.50
21 NS 2C S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 %22 NS 2C S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 25.00
27 NS 3T W-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane
17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane : 53,24 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 9 56.25
2 NS 5P W+1 -480 7 43.75
3 NS 5C E = -650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc : 49,77 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N+1 650 11 68.75
6 NS 3C S+1 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe : 59,26 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 6 37.50
8 NS 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
9 NS 4P N-3 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,39 %10 NS 3P N-3 -300 2 12.50
11 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00
12 NS 2CcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian : 46,06 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 14 87.50
14 NS 5KcN-3 -500 2 12.50
15 NS 2C E-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre : 40,74 %16 NS 4C N = 420 12 75.00
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 12.50
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond : 58,10 %19 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
20 NS 2C N = 110 10 62.50
21 NS 1CcS = 160 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique : 51,16 %22 NS 2T S = 90 15 93.75
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 62.50
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane : 40,28 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 10 62.50
26 NS 4P E-1 100 14 87.50
27 NS 2S S-1 -50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 216,0 / 432 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDEMEULEBROUCKE Nicole -DARMSTAEDTER Dominique
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 12 75.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 % 7 EO 4T N = 130 12 75.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %10 EO 3T W+2 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 100.00
12 EO 3K E-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 12 75.00
15 EO 2C W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %16 EO 4TcS-2 -300 16 100.00
17 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
18 EO 2P E+3 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 81.25
21 EO 3T W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %22 EO 2T S = 90 1 6.25
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 37.50
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 4T N-2 -200 14 87.50
27 EO 2TcW-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CHABOTIER Jean -ASHLEY Raymond
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 16 100.00
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50
8 EO 4P N = 420 16 100.00
9 EO 2P N = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 100.00
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50
12 EO 3T W-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 5C W = -450 8 50.00
15 EO 2C W = -110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 10 62.50
17 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %19 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
20 EO 2C N = 110 6 37.50
21 EO 1CcS = 160 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %22 EO 3C S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %25 EO 4C N = 420 15 93.75
26 EO 4P E = -620 16 100.00
27 EO 3P N = 140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 251,0 / 432 = 58,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VINCLAIR Jacqueline -MARLET Pierre
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00
3 EO 3C W+2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 % 4 EO 3S W-2 200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 100.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 4P N-3 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %10 EO 3T W+2 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 3S E-1 50 3 18.75
12 EO 3T W = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 12.50
14 EO 6C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 2C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %16 EO 4C N = 420 4 25.00
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 87.50
18 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %19 EO 4C N-2 -100 13 81.25
20 EO 2C N = 110 6 37.50
21 EO 2P W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %22 EO 1S S = 90 1 6.25
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 EO 2C N+1 140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 176,0 / 432 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PIROTTE Benoit -RODE Christian
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 2C W+3 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 12 75.00
5 EO 3C N = 140 14 87.50
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 % 7 EO 4KcW-4 1100 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25
9 EO 2P N = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %10 EO 4T W+1 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 2CcS-1 -100 11 68.75
12 EO 2C E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 12.50
14 EO 5KcN-3 -500 14 87.50
15 EO 2C E-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %16 EO 4TcS = 510 0 0.00
17 EO 2P S+2 170 10 62.50
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 62.50
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 81.25
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 4 25.00
23 EO 3T E-1 100 2 12.50
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 1S W = -90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 199,0 / 432 = 46,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 5P E+1 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 3C W+2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 % 4 EO 2C E = -110 16 100.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 3C N+1 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 % 7 EO 2S S+1 150 8 50.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25
9 EO 2P N = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %10 EO 3P N-3 -300 14 87.50
11 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00
12 EO 2CcN-2 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 12.50
14 EO 6C E-1 50 3 18.75
15 EO 2C E-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %16 EO 3P E-1 100 10 62.50
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 87.50
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %19 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
20 EO 2C N+1 140 1 6.25
21 EO 4P E = -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %22 EO 3C S-3 -150 15 93.75
23 EO 2K W = -90 4 25.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %25 EO 4C N = 420 15 93.75
26 EO 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 EO 1S S+1 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 222,0 / 432 = 51,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 SEMAL Pierre -van der GRACHT Philippe
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 % 4 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 10 62.50
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 4P N-3 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 %10 EO 4T W+1 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 1ScS-1 -100 11 68.75
12 EO 4C E-3 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 50.00
15 EO 2KcN-1 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %16 EO 4T N-2 -100 14 87.50
17 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %19 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 81.25
21 EO 2K N-3 -300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %22 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 3P E = -140 8 50.00
27 EO 1S E = -90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 256,0 / 432 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CARTUYVELS Luc
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 5P W+1 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 3C S+1 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 2 12.50
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 %10 EO 3T W+1 -130 0 0.00
11 EO 2T E-1 50 3 18.75
12 EO 4C E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 5C E = -450 8 50.00
15 EO 2C W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %16 EO 3P E-1 100 10 62.50
17 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %19 EO 5C N-2 -100 13 81.25
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 81.25
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %22 EO 2T S-3 -150 15 93.75
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
24 EO 4CcN-1 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 75.00
27 EO 3T W-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COULIE Joëlle -de BORREKENS Vinciane
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 5P W+1 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 5C E = -650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 31.25
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 % 7 EO 2S N = 120 14 87.50
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 2CcW+1 -870 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 %10 EO 4T W+1 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 1S E-1 50 3 18.75
12 EO 3T W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 4PcN-4 -800 16 100.00
15 EO 2C E-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %16 EO 4PcE-2 500 2 12.50
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 87.50
18 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %19 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 100.00
20 EO 2C N+1 140 1 6.25
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %22 EO 2C S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 4 25.00
27 EO 2T W = -90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 230,0 / 432 = 53,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 BEHAGHEL DE BUEREN Elie -DELLA FAILLE Diane
5 MEYER Jean -LAFOURCADE Jean-Pierre : 59,03 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 7 43.75
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 56.25
3 EO 3T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 STEED Adrian -COUVREUR Daniel : 39,35 % 4 EO 2C E-1 100 12 75.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 100.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK Gabriel : 50,69 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 4 25.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 55,79 %10 EO 4T W+1 -150 7 43.75
11 EO 1S E-1 50 3 18.75
12 EO 3T W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 BUSLAIN Marianne -LOUIS Guy : 48,15 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 68.75
14 EO 6C E-1 50 3 18.75
15 EO 2C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 JACQUET Monique -ETZENBACH Bruni : 35,42 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 6 37.50
17 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 SMEYERS Marc -KOSCIELNIAK Jean : 50,69 %19 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
20 EO 2C N = 110 6 37.50
21 EO 2C S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 STELLIAN Lucienne -DERUYTTERE Richard : 60,88 %22 EO 2T S-2 -100 8 50.00
23 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4CcS-1 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 VERELST Jean -VERELST Christiane : 50,00 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 6 37.50
26 EO 4P E-1 100 2 12.50
27 EO 2S S-1 -50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 174,0 / 432 = 40,28 %
|
|
